Garrett Lisi: A beautiful new theory of everything
beautytherapists.net
No related posts.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Tags: Beautiful Model, Lisi, Model Of The Universe, Surfer, Ted
This entry was posted on Saturday, January 16th, 2010 at 11:35 amand is filed under Tech. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Beauty Therapy
25 Responses to “Garrett Lisi: A beautiful new theory of everything”
OK, so I get what this is about mathematicly. What I don’t understand is why it should compete to the string theory. There’s nothing in string theory that stops the different stable vibrations the strings allow to fit into that E8 pattern mathematicly. Actually using this to “map” the different string vibrations may hold a key to explaining the strings “shape” in an abstract form, but that’s just me daydreaming. Am I overlooking something or are the two theories indeed compatible?
this theory isnt easy to understand, i dont really like it shape etc , i like garret lisi ‘s attitude though, good video interesting idea
Compare Brian Greene’s: Universe on a String Vs. Garrett Lisi’s E8. They like the word ‘beautiful’ because you boost your theory by endorsement from the pervasive aesthetic (We’ll call him Beautiful). Watson/Crick bypassed messing with a less beautiful but potentially true idea and guessed, and pressed on, to the ‘Beautiful’ DNA. THey knew they had it in the end because…..it was beautiful. You see-there’s absolutely no religion in science!!!!! BTW– String is ugly!
My understanding is that this is now a case of E8 Vs. String Theory (presented here on Ted by the MIT guy). My understanding is that the String guys hate this and i’ve heard of some pretty base insults thrown Garrett’s way, The LHC will confirm the existence, in theory, of the Higgs but will also determine which of the two competing ideas stands. Garrett avoided the ‘Big Science’ establishment of University/Govt. complex and is a freelancer surfer dude. Watch the string guy & compare ideas.
Keep in mind it’s still a theory. Like he said himself “This theory and others like it are long shots, one does a lot of hard working knowing that most of these ideas probably wont end up being true about nature. Thats what doing theoretical physics is like.” I don’t think we understand enough about the universe to have an all encompassing theory of everything… yet, at least… Nonetheless this theory is extremely complex and thought provoking. Who am I to say whether or not it’s true
yeah… I rofl’d a few times XD
i liked his jokes. I think it was just late in the day or something.
Well, maybe he shouldn’t have put his theory in the same video as his alien pyramid landing ideas.
But seriously, no it isn’t.
yea i couldnt focus when i kept hearing whistling nose hairs between each sentence…
Flower of life
The theory of everything it thats it must be its beautiful.
The theory of everything it must be its beautiful.
Hello, just seen your “AntiGravity Physics Explained” video and it is very nice, I am conducting my research on a specific part of UFO’s field and wanted to ask you :
*is it OK to copy this video from you ?
*where do you know /understand that field ?
this is what nassim haramein is telling for the last 6 years …
it’s more difficult listening to the speaker than to understand the subject of his talk. sounds like a kid in middle school giving a book report.
i didnt so much enjoy hearing his breathing after he says a sentence
Fundamental Theory 0f Existence
1 The infinite vacuum T=0K
2 The particle: C/D = pi , E = Mc^2
3 The spins: h =E/t h* = h/2pi
4 The photon, the inertia
5 The electron: e^2 = h*ca, E = h*f , em field
6 The gravitation, the star, the time
7 The proton
8 The atom(s)
9 The cell(s)
10 The Laws
a) The Law of conservation and transformation energy/mass
b) The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
c) The Pauli Exclusion Principle
11 The test
damnit I got lost around 7:45 – he didn’t explain that part very well
It’s funny when non-funny guys try to be funny and fail. But not very.
Great ideas, though!
He bores me though it was interesting
this dude failed communications on college, no public speaking skillz.. good video tho
wrong! “I” imagined it
lol why do plp have to throw religon in sciece when its a diffent type of religon and as u know its not a debate about god cause even now the theories do show intellegent design but 4 1s can we just let go of the jewish history and see what is there and just except that theres a god but he or she or it does not show its self to humans unless we find it
Actually I would love equations, but still great lecture.
looks a lot like sacred geometry…. well someone had to say it!!
@liquidminds exactly, meaning everything he is saying is true in theory